Structuring a Diversion Program: Identifying Program Goals

Structuring a Diversion Program: Identifying Program Goals
Your Diversion Program Goals Need to be Identified Prior to Implementing Prosecutor-Led Diversion

The first step to developing your own diversion program is to identify goals that the program aims to address. Traditionally, as stated by the NDAA, “the purposes of diversion programs include: Unburdening court dockets and conserving judicial resources for more serious cases; reducing the incidence of offender recidivism by providing community-based rehabilitation that would be more effective and less costly than the alternatives available in continued criminal prosecution.”*

“Ample literature demonstrates cost- and time-effectiveness benefits for criminal justice systems and jurisdictions that implement prosecutor phase diversion programs, and that some diversion programs have measured reductions in recidivism.” -Camilletti, C., Pretrial diversion programs: Research summary, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice (2010).

However, two other considerations have emerged recently, and should be considered:

  1. Consistent Non-Discriminatory Application of Plea Deals and Diversion

  2. Proportionality of Punishment to the Crime.

Increasingly, prosecutor guidelines call for policies and consistency as it pertains to charging a defendant and offering diversion. The NDAA Standards, for instance, state that it is important to have standards and guidelines for consistent application of charges and “diversion decisions with respect to similarly situated defendants” when deciding to divert a case.**

Lastly, for many offenses, the social and collateral consequences of formal charges may be perceived to be too harsh. NAPSA Standards states “one of the foremost goals of the diversionary process is to reduce the stigma of a criminal conviction. With open records and online criminal dockets, that goal is compromised in many jurisdictions.”*** At a time when even a non-violent misdemeanor carries lifelong negative collateral consequences, it is important to establish a prosecutor-led diversion program to handle those kinds of charges, where even the collateral consequences are too grave to fit the crime.

We would love to open a discussion about your current diversion program initiatives for your district. Please contact Thomas Jonsson with the information below, or fill out the form on our contact us page.

Author Information

Thomas Jonsson

COO/GC

+ 1(949) 545-2467

TJonsson@CorrectiveSolutions.org

Works Citation

*NDAA Standards, Part IV, Commentary.

**NDAA Standards, Comments to Part IV.2, and 4-3.5.

***NAPSA Standards, 6.3 Commentary.

Share this post
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

More from the category

Check out our feature by The Change Companies, a leader in Evidence Based Curriculum, and our partner for recidivism impacting diversion programs!

In March 2018, CorrectiveSolutions began administering Probation Monitoring for Tucson City Court.

A common talking point that we run into when speaking to members of District Attorneys’ Offices is whether their diversion program is paid for by the offenders or by county resources using taxpayer funds.

Prosecutor-Led Diversion Programs generate a ton of data, and it's important to know what are good indicators of a successful program and how to interpret those indicators.

Featured articles